Wednesday 19 December 2012

Proposal Of My Documentary

________________________________
Should DANCE Be In The Olympics?
The aims of my documentary would be to try and get the evidence and answers for my five main questions. Whilst getting the answers for these questions I will look at trying to get opinions of the topic and on these main questions from random people and experts but the lead up of this document is to answer the main question. Underneath shows the 5 questions that I am looking to get answered and these are;
When was dance classified as a sport
Why should dance be considwered in the Olympics
Who decides what sports are put into the Olympics
How does dance compare to other existing Olympic sport events i.e syncorinzied swimming, floor gymnastics and figure skating
How is floor gymnastics and synchronised
My main reasoning for this topic is purely to answer a question that has been un-answered for a long time and see how things are changing (Olympics).
Content
The content in my documentary would be things like vox pops, for example I plan to interview random people in stratford and get their opinions of the Olympics just gone and then talk about what they think about dance and should it be in the olympics. I want it to look almost like you see it on Snog, marry, avoid as you see lots of box pops from random people in a busy area.


I would also include interviews with experts, as my document I want it to be set up like Top Gear so in a studio and all the footage seen is like stuff that I as a presenter have gone of sight to film i.e the box pops. So as I want interviews, I would have the interviews in the set up studio like how you'd see it on top gear.

I would also like to use archive footage of past dance competitions for example XXL Street Dance Championships, UK Street Dance Championships just so that known dancers can see the life of a dancer competing in dance shows which can reflect back on the scoring question. How would dance be judge in comparison to figure skating and gymnastics. I would also use archive footage of the olympics as throughout my documentary I want to compare the sporting events to dance maybe by using a spilt screen. I would also like to have some footage I've filmed to make an opening montage.
Target Audience                                            My main target audience would be towards the younger generation up until the middle generation so from 14-24 therefore has to have lots of different elements that are keen to all of the age groups across that board. I want it to reach out to males and females as dance is not just specific to one gender like football. I don't want it to come across as a specific show that only reaches out to dancers or Olympians as I want it to broadcast a lot.  
Format
The format would be based upon a studio set up with links to live coverage of me finding out information and talking about specific stuff i.e when talking about the olympics I would hope to film near the stadium which would also show that I'm out of the studio.


Tuesday 18 December 2012

Analysing The Competition

Using BARB (Broadcasting Audience Research Board) I will be closly looking at the factual programmes that are currently on and would be in competition with my programme that I am currently making.

My first programme I will look at which looks closely at being similar to my documentary as it has the same target audience range. This programme is also aired on BBC1 and my programme would be aired on BBC3 which shows their would be a lot of competition as they are both based upon dance they would most likely be aired at the same time. So the programme I am talking about is 'Strictly Come Dancing'. 
Strictly Come Dancing is a factual programme as it looks at the reality of celebrities going on to a dance competition based show to win the disco ball. This programme is also aired at 6.30 on a saturday but changes throughout the week but not drastically. We also acknowledge that this show is shown on two days being saturday and sunday

Looking at some resources I can say that strictly come dancing's figure rate rate from this saturdays show just gone they had over 10.4 million viewers which is more viewers than the X factor show which is very popular. This shows that this show will be a huge competition in regards to my factual programme.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/11/11/strictly-come-dancing-x-factor-viewing-figures_n_2113296.html

Comparison
This particular show has a very close similarity to my documentary as it is about dance and conveys actually dancing. In my documentary I will look at having a main host; particularly me as I wanted to do the 'Participatory' style and this factual programme uses presenters. It also looks at dancing from a competition based way which is what I would be doing as I am for dancing being in the Olympics so this ties in a lot because this programme could also feature in my documentary as I could look closely at how the judges judge the different dance styles and linking it back to the comparison on dancing and gymnastics. The only difference our programmes share is that Strictly Come Dancing is a competition based programme and mine is a Dance based programme and looking at how dance can be judge in the Olympics.

The format of the show can also be seen to be very similar as they interview the celebs training to win the competition which is where I would be interviewing those dancing who would consider to compete in the Olympics. It also has experts opinions i.e the judging panel which could link to my expert opinions through the format of an interview. So overall these two programmes are similar.

I believe my show would beat this show in terms of viewing figures as I would try and get everyone to watch it for example Strictly Come Dancing is a simple danced based show which makes the audience its views go up purely because of the celebrities, whereas my documentary will portray dance elements and a lot of Olympic opinions and facts which would reach out to a bigger target audience as many people would like to compete or even not to compete, many people watched the Olympics. I would also try and get interviews with very well known people to get more views, for example if I spoke to someone like Tweddle the female gymnast I'm sure a lot of people would tune in as they would like to know her response to the topic. I would also give the title of my programme a rhetorical question 'Should dance be Considered in the Olympics' which opens up the views because the rhetorical question gets viewers involved and thinking. 

Looking at the facts and figures of how much this factual programme is watched I would believe that my show would best be aired on a friday night as it leads up to big competition shows like Strictly Come Dancing and So You Think You Can Dance which would make the viewers more interested. Also this day would mostly be better as it would not clash with such a high watched programme. I'd look to air it around 6 as this time would be the best time for young people to watch it especially if they consider going partying and they would'y leave their house till later.
_________________________
My second factual programme that I will be looking at is the document styled programme; 'Olympics 2012; 5o Greatest Moment' which was aired on BBC 3. This programme is a factual programmed style liek a documentary as it looks at a real life event. The programme was first aired on the 17th December and is still available to watch until the 29th December. So this programme is broadcasted on BBC and is shown around the time of 8.30 but varies each week.  I could not find any information that showed the stats of how many views the programme recieved from its first viewing however I have come across the viewing figures of one of the Olympic events being the 10,000 metre final race with Mo Farah in it and teh stats for that one event was 17.1 million views which shows that this show would also be very popular as it would highlight all those greatest thing and the final race being one of those. Underneath shows the link to the source where I found this information. 

Comparison
Looking at this show incomparison to the documentary I'm making it contains alot of features that are the same . This show is particuly outlining what happened at the Olympics 2012 and my documentary will do the same, however would look more so at just the three Olympics events that I will be comparing dance too i.e Gymnastics, Syncronized swimming and figure skating which would not of been seen in the London Olympics as the London Olympics were the Summer Olympics. So both documentaries may contain some of the same footage being from the London Olympics.

The format is simular in certain ways but of course has a completetly different storyline. The 'Olympics 2012; 50 Greatest Moments' show all the highlights of the show and is there to go through alll the not seen footage and the stats whereas my show would look at how the olympics is put together in terms of sports that are getting put into the Olympics.

Content, the content will be simular as its both the same topic being the Olympics just looking at it from different views. I assume that the olympic show does not contain interviews and interesting shots as it is just a coutndown. So my work compared to this document would be different as I will cover footage that I've filmed rather than all archie footage from the Olympics 2012 and I will also look at how the Olympics has developed so looking at where esle the Olympics has been held.
The main simularity is that my programme brief is to be aired on BBC three and at 8, which may clash with this programme making the competition harder.
I beleive my shwo would beat this showe in terms of viewing firgures as I would show all teh different Olympic Venues and have more of a story behind my document rather than just looking at the highlights. My documentary may also get more viewers as I would look at trying to get interviews with famous people or people who would interest the sporting viewers i.e Beth Tweddle.
Underneath shows the video clip of the documentary 'London 2012; 50 Greatest Moments'.
_________________________
My last programme that I am looking at that would may be in competition with my programme is simular to Strictly Come dancing as it is an entertainment show and is callled 'Got To Dance'. Got To Dance is a dance based competition which looks at all different kinds of dance groups/troups/solo's and so on and is judge through panel. The panel on this year's Got To Dance is Aston(JLS), Ashley Banjo (Diversity) and Kimberely Wyaty (Pussycat Dolls) and has many interests as it shows all different types of dance styles. This show is broadcasted on Sky1 is usually aired on weekends (Sat&Sun). The show is usually on after 6 but this varies as different programmes come on different weeks and because of the football. I chose to look at this show as it is broadcasted on a different channel to the other two and brings different elements. The viewing figures are seen to be at 1.13 million, these viewing figures are the figures from the first week of Got To Dance and as the series have gone on the more viewers there currently are.
http://allstreetdance.co.uk/2011/02/28/got-to-dance-2011-episode-viewing-figures-week-by-week/
Comparison
The simalarities between this show and my documentary that I would be making is that they are both looking at dance and more so that people I would be interviewing would of been dancers that have come from this programme. Also I want to go in debth about street dance and its different styles that are branched out from this main style which is also something Got To Dance tries to captivate this.
The other comparison is that Got To Dance uses a presenter which is what I would like to do for my documentary and also its a based programme on judging dance acts which links into my argument about dance is able to be judge and Got to Dance is an example of this. So within my documentary I could use this show as an example.
The layout also includes interviews with experts (the judges) and also interviews with the contenstants which relates to my programme as I would like to interview dancers that would like to compete in the Olympics if dance was an event in the Olympics and also would like to interview experts so this relates closely.
 
I believe this show gets alot of views through the highly talented dancers and the idols of Aston Merrygold and Ashley Banjo so fir my programme to beat the views I would have to get really good dancers that the audience would actually want to know more about them and see them dance, I would also need to get interviews with well-esatblished people. As the audience will not wnat to watch an interview when they dont know who the interviewee is.


 

Contact List For My Documentary

20 People I'd Like To Interview
Underneath Shows a contact list of 20 different people from different backgrounds who I would hope to interview in my documentary. These 20 people I will be contacting them directly via email or through a number to see if I can make an agreement with them to have an interview with them in my documentary based on dance being in the Olympics. My contact list varies from specialists in dance, gymnastics and figure skating to those spokes people in their target field. I have also looked at interviewing people like the mayour of newham as the Olympics were held in Newham which could relate nice to the chosen topic by me.

Tuesday 4 December 2012

Five Key Question For My Final Idea

Secondary Research


Underneath outlines my 5 questions that I will be looking at mostly to develop my idea, these five questiosn will help me shape my documentary and give it a layout in terms of what to film.
1. When was dance classified as a Sport?
Dance is on the PE curriculum with the other area's of sports like athletics, gymnastics, games and so on. I found this information from a curriculum online websites where it also tells you what each of the area's do to the overall PE curriculum. Quoted by the website, 'Dance is to encourage children to improve their body management skills, to understand movement, to work with others and to develop creativity and imagination.'
http://www.curriculumonline.ie/en/Primary_School_curriculum/Physical_Education/
2. Why should dance be considered in The Olympics?
A source I have looked at has shown many people's opinions on this topic dancers and non dancers. The overall interpretation is that 'dancers are athletes, so if they are athletes then they should be apart of the Olympics which celebrates athletes.' As many people have said that dancers from all different backgrounds already compete and win Gold, Silver and Bronze. This links to the point that so do runners i.e there are small running comeptitions to see who is the best in the borough/country but it is the Olympics which allows the world to known who is the best in the world.

The link Below shows some different opinions on why 'dance should be considered in the Olympics. Whether for the topic or against they all have valid points and reasons.

My next reasoning that answers this question is going back to the topic dancers being athletes as in the Merriam Webster Dictionary it defines the word 'athlete' as a person who is trained or skilled in exercises, sports or games requiring physical strength, agility or stamina. According to this definition, a dancer is an athlete. Warm up exercises are a required so dancers do not pull their muscles. To jump high off the ground you need agility and strength. A dancer also requires stamina in order to take part in a dance production that could last upto 1hour and a half. Underneath shows a screen grab of the definition of an 'Athlete' in the dictionary.
3. Who decides what sports are put into the Olympics?
There are a number of people who choose what sports are put in the olympics, whether its the sport in the winter olympics or summer olympics and this is down to the international committee called the IOC. The international committee establishes the hierarchy of the sports. There are many governing bodies for example the International Swimming Federation who are in charge of all water sports. The committee choses which sports will be in the Olympics and they do this by analysing how many countries currently participate in it and if there are enough athletes to do the event. The Olympic committee also add two sports every time the Olympics are held through different country locations. These two sport events that are held are genially not main sporting events.
Most of this information I gathered about the international IOC was from the web link below.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_sports
Gathering more information from my web searches I started to understand how the Olympic Committee decides what sports are put into the Olympics and it is simply through the widening of the sport. What I been by this is how many people practise the sports, for an event to be held at the Olympics there needs to be at least 75 different countries  doing it, including the four continents. These stats are only see through the male prospective and is different to women as for the sport to be chosen there needs to be at least 40 different countries participating from a females outlook and three continents may wish to be included. So for an event to be held at the Olympics the committee look at how widely the sport is practiced. Under I quote information seen from a different source which relates back to my question.
'An event, being a competition in an Olympic sport or in one of its disciplines and resulting in a ranking, gives rise to the award of medals and diplomas. To be included in the Program, an event must, first and foremost, enjoy a recognized position internationally in both numerical and geographical terms and have featured at least twice in world or continental championships. Sports, disciplines or events in which performance depends essentially on mechanical propulsion are not acceptable.'
http://www.olympic.org/ioc
4. How does dance compare to other existing olympic sport events i.e syncorinzied swimming, floor gymastics, figure skating?
Comparison Through Figure Skating & Dancing
I found an interesting article by Meagan a dancer and she compares dance to figure skating which is infact a sporting event at the olympics.Figure Skating is not seen at every Olympic event as it is a winter sport so is seen every 8years. She says, as I quote her words 'Dance involves movement of the body, which makes it physical like a sport. Like figure skating'  This shows a comparision between dance and Figure skating as they more use the same technique which is the movement within the body and also makes it very physical and demanding.
Another quote from the same source that I find interesting is that there are many simalarities that connect the figure skating with dancing.



'While dance is often considered artistic, skating also values artistic elements, even considering them in half of the judging score. Both dance and figure skating are usually done to music, which plays an integral role in the performance. Finally, like Olympic figure skating, dance can be done solo and in pairs. With all of these similarities, it starts to seem that skating is simply dancing on ice.' Underneath I have displayed the link where I have recieved this information from and it also has much more deep throughts into the topic and how much the two sports are related.

Expert Opinion
Another source I have seen via the internet is the comparison between Figure skatinga and Gymnastics which I would like to link to dance. 'Figure skating is very simular to artistic gymnastics' which I quote Beth Tweedle who is from the UK's Olympic Gymnast squad. Quoting what  Beth Tweedle said who is a three time olympian and was also the first british gymnast to have ever won a medal at the European Championships. World Championships, or the Olympic Games and is considered to be the most successful Britsih Gymast of all time.
Beth said; 'In some ways, figure skating is very similar to my sport, artistic gymnastics. Like in gymnastics, skaters require a good technical and artistic base as well as some serious confidence. These skills are something that I needeed when I'm going into my tumbling passes and series of jumps, in the floor event.' This reverts back to the similarities dance has with Figure skating and Gymnastics. As dance requries a lot of courage to do tricks as the move dance evolves the more danegrous tricks are being made up i.e do back flips off people's chests and also do flips over people.


Simalarities between the laying out of each of the competitons:
What also connects dance and gymastics is the different area's you ahve in gymastics which are listed below:


Artistic Gymnastics (Men/Women)
Rhythemic Gymastics
Womens Beam
Mens Horizontal Bar
Womens Floor Exercise
and are more shown to the right in the screen grab.

Which reflect on my point that dance is simular to Gymnastics as it also has different elements i.e
Street Dance has many dance styles:
Hip Hop
House
Breaking
Waacking
Locking
Popping

Modern Dance also has different sub dance styles being:
Tap
Ballet
Contempary
Jazz
Salsa
Ballroom

There are also different ways dance is judge and this can be seen throughout street dance and modern dance i.e:
Solo
Duo
Group (5-7)
Crews (5-22)

This relates to the driving as in the London Olympics just gone we saw many different categories which were solo, duo and group.

Gymnasts train in dance first
Another source I have come across is by a guardian writer called Judith Mackrell and she talks about how most successful gymnasts train in dance before going into Gymnastics and most still do to help with the ariel choreography. She also gives examples of Gymnasts who ahve previously trained in dance as I quote her words underneath.

'Some of the world's most famous dancers, Sylvie Guillem and Sergei Polunin included, started out as gymnastic prodigies; many of today's Olympians have trained with ballet masters and mistresses in order to hone their elegance of phrasing and line.' I like this source as it shows that dance is an important part to most sporting events and not just in Gymnastics, it is also seen in figure skating. It also shows that dance is something taht makes the gymnastic pieces more interesting and if they ahve judging criteria for that then surely it must be easy to do the same for just a dance based Olympic event.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2012/aug/06/gymnastics-olympics-2012-dance

5. How is floor gymastics and sycorinized swimming judge?

I have researched 'floor exercise' which is known as the most dance related gymastic apparatus. This event is simply judge on a 90second piece which is a 'choregraphed routine which composes of acrobatic and dance elements.' Looking at the elements that the floor exercise reqires is very simular to a dancers competition and hwo they would judge i.e after looking at the information recieved from wikipediea, a gynmast uses proffesional choregraphers to make their routine up just like a dancer would and are allowed any song by choice just with no spoken word content.

Floor Exercise is judge from four factors and these are the difficulty of the performance for example the routine hhow difficult it was, or the tumble, did they do a back tuck into a fulls sequence or did they stick to something basic. Artisty, demonstration of required elements which is just reflecting on the required elements how did they demonstarte them? The last point is their overall performance quality. Their are also deducation;

'Deductions are taken for poor form and execution, lack of required elements, and falls. The gymnast is expected to use the entire floor area for his or her routine, and to tumble from one corner of the mat to the other. Steps outside the designated perimeters of the floor incur deductions. The gymnast will also incur a deduction if there are lyrics in the music'

I found all this information through the wikipedia website which is listed below:

Judging At The Olympics:
The judging at the Olympics is a bit more simple than all those other competitions in Gymnastics they score it soley on difficulty and execution with the falt of your penalities. I gathered this infromation from the Olympic results website which tells you the scroes of each gymnast and what made their performance better.
http://www.london2012.com/gymnastics-artistic/event/women-floor-exercise/index.html
How are Synchronized Swimming judge
After looking on the internet I have found a website that explains to me how the Synchronized swimming is judge which has been put together by the FINA relgations.Synchronized swimming is judge through a scale from 0-10 and its spilt into diffrent sections these sections and these sections are all based on the performance and you need to get the highest mark out of 10 to recieve the best possible score. Underneath shows the breakdown of how they score the performances:

0                        Completely failed
0.1-1.9           Hardly recognizable
2.0- 2.9         Very weak
3.0- 3.9         Weak
4.0- 4.9         Deficient
5.0- 5.9         Satisfactory
6.0- 6.9         Competent
7.0- 7.9         Good
8.0- 8.9         Very good
9.0- 9.4         Excellent
9.5- 9.9         Near perfect
10                     Perfect

Underneath shows the link that I got the infromation from and all the information I recieved.

Different Panels
I have also found out more information from a different source about the scoring system but this is abit different as it goes through who judges what for example there is one panel of judges that judge the execution of the technical routine with the required elements.Then there us another panel that look at the 'overall impression: choreography, synchronisation, difficulty and manner of presentation.'. So as we now know there are two different sets of judges they both look at different things. 'In the free routine, the technical merit judges score the difficulty and execution of strokes/movements as well as the synchronisation of the swimmers. The other panel is looking at artistic impression, which includes choreography, music interpretation and manner of presentation.'
'Synchronized swimming also has rules and ways they should not be broken and below shows what these rules are. Judges can award point deducation for a variety of infringements, including taking too long on the deck before the swimmers enter the pool, making deliberate use of the botton of the pool or missing out any of the complusory elements of the technical routine.

Saturday 1 December 2012

My Three Initial Ideas With The Feedbacks

Underneath shows my three initial ideas and me speaking about them. I briefly looked at the angle of which I will look at the three different idea's I had made which where; Why is dance not in the Olympics, A Budget of a highs tree look to a designer look and Are shows like X factor, Britain's Got Talent fixed? When speaking about the three idea's to my classmates and I looked;

- Who I would Interview
- The mode I will convey; Realism, Dramatisation, Performative, Reflexive, Observation etc
- If it would relate to my target audience

Idea One: Why Is Dance Not In The Olympics

Idea One Feedback:
__________________________
Idea Two: A Budget On A Outfit
 
 Idea Two FeedBack:

__________________________
Idea Three: Are programmes like X Factor fixed?
 
 Idea Three FeedBack:

Monday 19 November 2012

Rules For Beginners; Documentaries

Different Codes & Conventions within Documentaries
Rules For Beginners

The video I have attached below will direct you through all the different rules that can be used in factual documentaries and these rules include; Accuracy, Balance, Impartiality, Objectivity, Subjectivty, Opinion, Bias, Representation, Access & Privacy and Contract to the viewer. You will understand how different factual programmes use them and how some go against them.

Sunday 18 November 2012

Codes & Conventions of Documentary

Modes Of Documentary-Nicholls
Their are five different types of modes that a documentary can outline and most documentaries tend to stick to one mode and use ot throughout their documentary. Although some of the different modes can have no facts in them the presented topic is still real making them factual programmes(Documentaries).
The Different modes by Nicholls are:

1. Expository
2. Observational
3. Interactive
4. Reflexive
5. Performative

There are also three different conventions that may be seen in the different types of documentaries.
1. Realism- Shows actuality footage(real footage), techniques that would be seen would be things like; handheld camera, interviews with people involed in the topic/accident etc, satitics and graphs to support the facts. They may also show the the setting up of camera's before the filming.
2. Dramatisation- mainly creating a drama out of a real life situation so may include things like cliff hangers, voice overs, music, graphics(CPI) and this is all done through a re-enactment of the situation.
3. Narrativisation-the narrative side if things is purely about creating a story based on facts.
1. The Expository Mode

The first mode I will be looking at is Expository and I will look at what technique this uses to convey the 'truth' within the factual programme/documentary.  This type of mode is soley looked at as the truth it's main aspect to to display a firm sense of truth with all the concerntions based upon it. This typ of mode often uses a narrative and shows the different conventions of voice overs, footage that was filmed as stage and talks directly to the audience. So this type of documentary only looks at the truth and displays facts.This type of mode may have the convention of realism ni it as it wants to diplay a truth about the topic and teh realsim looks simply at the facts and using actuality footage for almost a source of proof. Expository mode documentaries are mainly seen through nature films.

The example I have given is called 'March of The Peguins' which is a documentary about the yearly life of penguins, it shows them repoducing their babies and just getting through the year and doing the day to day things that they do. This expository documentary gives information about the peguins hat are all facts and very worthy facts through the use if a voice over. It also explains what happens and clarifies the concept of Peguins having babies. They do this through an objective way which is mat through facts, so this type of doucmntary does not showcase any opinions towards penguins it's all based on facts, however although this documentary is based purely on facts it still uses conventions to make it engaging and reflects back to the commitmt of the topic. It also looks at presenting some kind of news which may never of been known before. This documentary is narrated by Morgan Freeman who is a man who alot of people take seriously so this links to the documentary being taken seriously.


March of the penguins is a expository documentary as it uses certain conventions which are displayed underneath:
-Voiceover; There is a consent voiceover by Morgan Freeman where he presents facts for example where tells the viewers that it is the 'parents job to keep their chiq from the cold'. By having Morgan Freeman as the narrator makes it seem more trust worthy than what it would be if you had a young person doing a voiceover. The voice over also shows a sense of Morgan Freemon talking directly to the audience.

- Stage footaged; This documentary does not genuially use archieve footage it is mainly uses stage footage and this is because it wants it to look engaing and be very interesting to watch rather than just having archive footage that does not support the things Morgan Freeman is saying. There are many examples that implify that this documentary underneath shows some of the main ones I believe show that the documentary is staged.
These screen shots above show staged parts within the documentary because the camera is in the exact place where the shots looks best for example a mid shot of the penguins together then a close up shot of their feet then a low agle shot of th penguin diving onto the ice. Some of the sots also look like they are computerised and edited because espically the first section you would not be able to get that many camera under water at that cold tempreature so thety had edited this backgrough together.

-This documntary also talks directly to the audience but does not show a human throughout the whole documentary it is only to show the penguins this may be  to not show any opinions and other conventions.
What does it contain?

This documentary shows that out of the three different conventions; Realism, Dramatisation & Narrativisation that this documentary is 'Dramatisation' because it showcases different aspects that relate to because dramatisation  for example the re-enactments through the staged parts show that some of the footage does not show the footage is real. It is re-enacted stuff that actually happens. Dramatisation documentaries also show the use of graphics and CPI which is clearly seen through th shot of the penguins in the sea.
The screen shots shows how they may have used CPI to give the affct that it was filmed underneath the water. It also show show the camera angle is exactly where it should be which shows that the scene as been stage.

It also uses cliff hangers to make it more engaging to th audience for example when the egg is hatching it is a cliff hanger because the audience are waiting for the egg to hatch but it doesn't and the whole documentary is a cliff hanger because as viewers we want to see how teh family end.

2. The Observational Mode
The observational mode is another example of a mode catergised from Bill Nichols. This mainly looks at being very truthful and objective which is meant by giving the facts.  It's main purposwe is to try and capture everything as accurate as possible. This type of documentary is seen to have th efilmmaker always begind the camera and never really seeb this is so they do not influence the actions/events or the viewers point of view it is almost like the other wants to just portray the facts.  As this is not a staged documentary the camera techniques will be shakey and not very clear because as the filmmaker they do not unfluence what they are about to film. This can most definetly be linked with realism as it is not re-enacted and it uses the actuality footage.

The example I have given for an observational mode is the Geri Halliwell documentary, this documentary is an 'Observational' documentary as it uses the conventions that display this mode. The Geri Halliwell documentary is about Geri Halliwell a former pop singer from girl group the 'Spice Girls' and is to show her as an individual after leaving the girl pop group. Gri Halliwell wanted someone to document her life and what it was like after leaving the group. This documentary is observational as it does best to exemplify the cinema truth. The Geri Halliwell shows that it tries to capture everything as accurate as possible this is seen when there may be times Geri is not doing much but it shows that you can believe everything being filmed. It also shows that the camera shots are not always good and this is not the important element. Underneath shows the video of the documentary and will be where I will show all the conventions the documentary displays as an observational documentary.
The Molly Dineen Collection; Geri Halliwell documentary is an Observational documentary as it portrays the following conventions:

Unstage footage throughou documentary: There is no staged footage as the camera person filming cannot influence the actions or events taking pace as it is based on a real life person. We see in the documentary that the camera person literally just follows Geri Halliwell to her destinations, we understand that their is no stage footage as sometimes the camera lady is not sure whats going to happen and therefore does not know what to film. The picture to the lieft helps show that the doumentary is not stage as she is just using a webcam to talk about what ever has happend rather than film it from lots of different angls making it look more engaging.

For example here, the three screen grabs underneath show how the filmemaker did not know what was happening and was just following Geri Halliway to her destination. The camera seesm handheld as the camera is very shaky as seen from when following Geri to her studio. This type of convention helps with the truth of teh documetary helping the viewers believe what is happening because if you were to try and staged this it would not look natrual with all the paparrazi.

We also see very shaky camera movement and no different shots which also add to the belief of an observational documentary. The picture above supports this point.

Hidden Filmaker: Throughout this documentary we do not see the filmaker as this is not an important aspect towards the documentary and this can lead peoples focus of which is why throughout the documentary we also see Geri Halliwell and those she speaks to for exampel when she goes to see her family (Mum).

Truth: This documentary is all about the truth of Geri Halliwell and why she left the group and so but does not convey support for the facts because this kind of set up, you should natrually believe everything being said. This documentary is not to influence anyones attitude on Geri Halliewell all those around her, it is to simply document her life.
What does it contain?
As we know there are three different types of documentary codes and it is clear that this documentary uses the 'Realism' code to get the message across. We see this throughout the documentary as it displays a firm sense of realisen through the camera tecahniques being handheld and we can tell this by the shaky camera movements and the low amount of cuts and no use of camera angles.

Shows realism through the handheld camera and the shaky camera movements
It also uses actuality footage in the documentary as everything being filmed is actually happening and it is not being re-enacted, we can see this through sometimes you might see them setting up the camera's.

We also see that the documetary uses the technique within realism with teh use of interviews with Geri Halliwell and other people. This also shows that it is an obersavtional documentary that uses the code realism.
This picture is almost liek an interview but is a meeting with her record and where she is speaking about her songs and albums.
3. The Participatory Mode
This mode is also known as the interactive mode and shows different codes and conventions to the other two modes previously explained. This mode is completely different to the obersavational mode as it is more about the engagement between the filmmaker and the subject. So for example in these types of documetaries you tend to see the filmmaker having a big role within the events being recored and I will explain this further with my example used. The filmmaker in this type of documentary is very different than the observational documentary as he often influences what is going to happen and what is going to be filmed.

The example I have for the Participatory mode is a Michael Moore documentary called 'Bolwing for columbine'. This is a good example of a participatory documentary as Michael Moore the directer is very involved in the documentary as he engages to the different material being address which is mainly on guns. He also seems like an essential part of the documentary as he is the person who feeds all the information to the audience; almost like a character within the documentary.

Filmmaker Involvement- The first convention we establish that confirms our beliefs that this documetary is 'Participatory' is that Michael Moore who is the filmmaker enages with the audience and we often see throughout the documentary Michael Moore talking directly to the viewers this shows that whilst he is doing this he is giving facts but above all he presents his opinions as facts and wants the audience to believe what he belives.  This screen shot towards the left shows how much Michael Moore is involved and he is the person who interviews everyone. This shows that he becomes apart of all the events. underneath shows different scenes where he plays a big role in delivering the facts.

Michael Moore likes to involve himself more so than other documentaries and this is mainly ebcause he feels strong about the topc being documented theirfore he wants to step in. We still in this documetary that Michael Moore is very Bias as he believes the United States is the worst for shooting and he gets all his support needed for his opinion to be proven right. This style of mode makes it more engages and makes the viewers want to watch it and understand it.
 What does it contain?
 This documentary can be agued to be different codes as it uses different techniques from the different codes being Realism, Dramatisation and Narrativisation. It shows all of these different are's through different techniques. 

Realism: We understand this documentary falls under realism as it is based on a real life situation of guns in America. It also has many different interviews were Michael Moore interviews specialists in their fields i.e the police to get more background knowledge of the gun crime in America. 
We see actuality footage of the past when people would be shot this is seen 50 minutes into the film. We also hear a voice over of the phone call got was made when the pre-school girl died. This shows realism because it is not a re-enactment what we are listening to was real. 

Dramatisation: Bowling for Columbine also has an element of dramatisation as it uses the conventions of voiceovers; this is mainly seen throughout the documentary as Michael Moore illustrates everything happening. It also uses graphics and as viewers we see this when Michael Moore is emphasising of the figures for example when Michael Moore is saying how many people are killed by guns each year it shows the figures on the screen. 

Narrativisation: The narrativisation element side of the documentary shows that it is narrated and their is a specific storyline and we see this as it links to Michael Moore having power over what happens as he is the presenter going to the different locations. We see that their is a storyline and this was leading up to him sorting out the gun crimes and we see this towards the end when he asks certain individuals to say sorry.
4. The Reflexive Mode
The reflexive mode is more based upon re-enactments of what happened/subject, this mode is not necessarily the truth but is 'a' truth. As viewers we see the putting together of the document and as they re-create stuff that happened. So this documentary you would see the nature of equipment being set up and filmed things that may not be irellavant but all these conventions help make the documentary be real and making the audience believe what they are watching as it is the truth. This type of documentary also does not have a particular side for examples the bowling fro columbine Michael Moore was against guns and wanted to do everything he could to lower the gun crimes whereas this documentary just focuses on the facts of what happened and the piecing together of things. 

The example I have for the reflexive mode is the 'Biggie & Tupac' Documentary. This documentary is about the two murdered rappers 'The notorious B.I.G and Tupac. This documentary showcases the investigation of the two deaths and trying to understand who did it and why. This documentary shows the mode of reflexive as we see the setting up of camera's before the filming, this shows they have nothing to hide and going back on the definition this links to it being a 'truth'.
We see the camera's rolling out of the actual footage being shown and we see this when the nurse says ''please stop rolling as this has nothing to do with..." this shows the reflexive mode. This is almost to expose everything that is happening so that the viewers can see exactly what the filmmaker went through during this hard process.  It also makes the audience aware of the editing, sound and recording. 
What does it contain?
This documentary example is mostly towards the conventions of being 'realism' as it is trying to portray the truth and that's it. It is not trying have cliff hangers or trying to build a story. This documentary cannot narrate a story as they are investigating and this can change throughout the documentary if they do not achieve the information they need.

HandHeld Camera: This documentary uses a handled camera as it often doe not know what is going to happen as it is not narrated.
Actuality Footage: Throughout this documentary we are shown actuality footage for example when we see at the beginning of the documentary of a very old series of the serge awards which shows them after receiving there awards. This relates to them being really loved in the music industry.
Interviews: We see many different interviews throughout the documentary and this is for the filmmaker to get more information on what happened. 

Stats&Graphs: We also see statics and graphs relating back to the facts being said via a voice over. We see this when Michael Moore is talking about the gun crimes and this all supports what he is saying.

5. The Performative Mode
The last mode is the Performative mode and this is meant by how deeply the filmmaker is involved in the documentary and how performative it is. This type of documentary is most seen to be very subject as it only shows the side of the the subject person. So it is not a balanced documentary. This type of documentary also can be used to generate emotions in the audience. 


The example I have given for the performative mode is the documentary called 'CatFish' this documentary is a clear example of the mode performative as the main guy making the video is the subject of the story. We see his views throughout the documentary and is entirely based on him and an experience. Catfish is about a young man who is being filmed and documented by his brother and friend whilst building a relationship with a female through a social networking site 'Facebook' and as the story develops we see that he was being played and was not talking to a young girl but in fact was talking to the mother. Underneath shows a clip from the documentary.

As we know and understand their are three different types of conventions that can be used within documentaries and these are; realism, dramatisation, narrativisation. Looking at the different techniques that are used in each one we can see that Catfish can fall under Dramatisation and Narravtivsation. 

Dramatisation: We see the use of dramatisation as the documentary uses cliff hangers to keep the viewer hooked in this automatically makes it more interesting and as viewers we want to see what happens when he meets her. Is she real or not? That right there shows us its a cliff hanger because we have to wait unit the end to see what happens, its almost telling a story

Voice Overs: The voice overs we hear are mainly through his (Nev) and her phone calls so we can hear what she is saying, there is no particular voice over that tries to steer the viewer to one side as this documentary is not based upon sides it is just to entertain. This documentary is different to the rest I have spoken about because this is the least real, it does not display any firm if realism in it or 'truth' their are no reenactments its all happening as they film which makes it seem like it has been directed. 

Music: We hear music for suspense when he is about to meet the young girl he as been talking to for a while through social network sites. Throughout the documentary we hear many different music lay overs and all for different reasons.

Narrativisation: As viewers we can argue that this documentary is narrativiation as its main purpose is to tell a story and we see a clear storyline where a boy meets a girl through a social networking site.